Repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture using a double-ended needle.

PURPOSE To compare the results of Achilles tendon repair using a standard open procedure or a minimally invasive technique using a double-ended needle, and to determine whether the latter technique reduces the incidence of sural nerve injury and soft-tissue complications. METHODS Between the period February 1995 and September 2000 inclusive, 68 consecutive patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture underwent surgical repair in our hospitals. A standard open repair was performed on 43 patients (mean age 36 years and range 17-74 years, 30 males), while 25 patients (mean age 34 years and range 19-68 years, 17 males) elected to undergo the minimally invasive procedure involving a double-ended needle. Postoperative protocols were identical for the 2 groups. Patients were assessed for re-rupture, calf muscle strength, calf atrophy, wound healing, and ability to return to pre-injury activity. The mean follow-up period was 65.5 (range, 34-90) months. RESULTS One late re-rupture and one sural nerve injury occurred in the standard open repair group. No rerupture or sural nerve injury occurred in those having minimally invasive surgery, they also reported fewer complications related to wound healing and a shorter hospital stay. Calf atrophy was also significantly less in this group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION This double-ended needle repair technique is simple and reproducible. The needle is easy to make using a standard mini Steinmann pin with minimal cost. Combined with appropriate rehabilitation, the technique achieves good results and is associated with a low morbidity and complications.